Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marc Polmans vs Jose Statham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Polmans vs Statham analysis and find out who is favored!
Marc Polmans vs Jose Statham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Polmans 3 - 1 Statham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polmans has won 46.99% of points on their second serve, while Statham has won 53.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polmans, in recent form, has won 50.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Statham has won 52.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.34% and 24.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Polmans has saved 59.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Statham has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Polmans has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Statham winning 38.1% (W/L 16/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 96/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16). Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.11% of matches (W/L 13/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Polmans winning 3 times and Statham being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Polmans winning 6 and Statham winning 2. The last match between Polmans and Statham was at the Sydney Challenger, 01-11-2022, First, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Polmans and Statham have played a deciding set 0 times, with Polmans winning 0 times and Statham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Polmans winning 0, and Statham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polmans has played against opponents with an average rank of 346.5 while Statham has played against players with an average rank of 342.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polmans has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Statham has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Polmans has converted 48.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Statham has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
200
Rank
116
High
27
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
678
Rank
279
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (324-255)
Career Total W/L
57% (604-455)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$579,380
Career Prize Money
$33,515
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marc Polmans | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 43 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:9 | 1:34:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (139/234) | 64% (166/261) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (104/139) | 65% (108/166) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (45/95) | 49% (47/95) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (12/34) | 39% (7/18) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (106/261) | 36% (85/234) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Marc Polmans
Player
Jose Statham
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jose Statham
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marc Polmans | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (16/23) | 46% (12/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (169/188) | 48% (129/138) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:29 | 1:32:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 352.94 | 304.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (753/1138) | 58% (405/696) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (512/753) | 69% (280/405) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (182/385) | 54% (156/291) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (39/80) | 48% (20/42) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (386/1067) | 35% (238/674) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 36% (4/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
10
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Polmans Vs Statham Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
